We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content.
Bring fact-checked results to the top of your browser search. Western political philosophy from the start of the 20th century Nineteenth-century European civilization had been the first to dominate and pervade the whole world and to create a new self-sustaining productivity in which all eventually might share.
But, as Saint-Simon had pointed out, this civilization had a fatal flaw. The rule of lawaccepted within the politically advanced states, had never been achieved among them. Within states, also, laissez-faire capitalism had exacerbated class conflicts, while the decline of religious belief had undermined traditional solidarity.
And inwhen a general European war broke out, the peoples, contrary to the hopes of cosmopolitan revolutionaries, rallied behind their national governments.
When the victorious powers failed to promote world order through the League of Nationsa second global conflict, even more horrific than the first, ensued, during which were developed weapons so destructive as to threaten life everywhere.
In the aftermath of these catastrophes and the worldwide revulsion they occasioned, not least against the European colonial powers, various mainstreams of 20th-century political philosophy may be discerned.
First, Marxism continued to inspire revolutionary doctrines as well as more-sober political and cultural analyses, some relying on insights borrowed from psychoanalytic theory. Second, liberalism continued to be developed and refined, partly in response to libertarian and communitarian critiques.
Third, a line of thought pursued by Michel Foucault and later postmodern philosophers questioned the possibility of objectively valid political values and genuinely neutral political institutions. And fourth, some feminist philosophers argued that the historical domination of men over women in the political and economic spheres reflects the inherently oppressive nature of heterosexual relationships.
The major proletarian revolutions, for example, came not in economically advanced countries but in economically underdeveloped ones Russia and Chinaand the supposedly proletarian dictatorships they produced, far from withering away or being diminished by inexorable economic trends, became even more powerful and oppressive than the governments they replaced.
Soviet and eastern European communism eventually collapsed in failure in —91, to be replaced in Russia by a quasi-democratic capitalist oligarchy.
Vladimir Ilich Lenin, In he further adapted theory to the times. His New Economic Policy sanctioned the development of a class of prosperous kulak peasantry to keep the economy viable.
For Lenin always thought in terms of world revolution, and, in spite of the failure of the Marxists in central Europe and the defeat of the Red armies in Poland, he died in the expectation of a global sequel.
Thus, in Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalismhe had extended the class war into an inevitable conflict between European imperialism and the colonial peoples involved.
He had been influenced by the English historian J. Marx himself might have thought that such planned autocracies had made the worst of his revelation.
But world revolution is contingentnot inevitable, and Marxism is an instrument, not a prediction. In Wider den missverstandenen Realismus ; The Meaning of Contemporary Realismhe again relates Marx to Hegel and even to Aristotleagainst the Stalinist claim that Marx made a radically new departure.
The Italian communist philosopher Antonio Gramsci deployed a vivid rhetorical talent in attacking existing society. Gramsci was alarmed that the proletariat was being assimilated by the capitalist order.
He took his stand on the already obsolescent Marxist doctrine of irreconcilable class war between bourgeois and proletariat. We must be ready to fight it because it blurs the clear separation of classes.
Gramsci insisted that the old culture should be destroyed and that education should be wrenched from the grip of the ruling classes and the church. But this militant revolutionary was also a utopian.Political and ethical philosophy in English-speaking countries in the first half of the 20th century was inhibited to some extent by the advent in the early s of logical positivism, which conceived of knowledge claims on the model of the hypotheses of natural science.
10 translations of the book (Kjellén, , ), the previously mentioned early 20th century as products of the Japanese geopolitics boom translations into German. in the s and early s (Spang, , pp.
Kjellén not only dealt with geopolitics but 5). The Heartland Theory and the Present-Day Geopolitical Structure of Central Eurasia The Planet’s Pivot Area in Mackinder’s Theory The geopolitical situation of the early 21st century gave a new boost to.
Home > Early 20th Century Geopolitical Theories Essay Access Check Our systems have detected unusual traffic activity from your network. Please complete this early 20th Century Geopolitical Theories Essay to demonstrate that it’s you making the requests and not a robot.
Early 20th Century Geopolitical Theories Essay - Introduction Geopolitics has been a major obsession of nation-s¬tates throughout history and even today.
The strategies that nation-states use to assert their position in relation to other states are complex and changing with .
Oppression in the Early 20th Century Essay. treated as equals to men. In the early 20th century, women faced adversity in the sense that it was a struggle living at that time because they had a specific role to live up to, and that role was being housewives to the men.
The early 20th Century was a .