Thanks to worldwide sales, the Gardasil vaccine has become the top money maker for Merck.
However such essays may be rather different from those that you have written before. What Mercks case ethical essay want to do in this handout, accordingly, is to describe some of the more important characteristics of such essays, and to offer some suggestions which you may find helpful.
You should indicate exactly what your topic is, and the view that you intend to defend. You should also tell the reader how your discussion will be structured, so that he or she knows from the very beginning the general lines along which you will be arguing in support of your conclusion.
You should also indicate, very briefly, your main line of argument. Finally, you should do these things as concisely as possible, so that you can get on with the business of defending the view that you are setting out on the moral issue in question. Illustration Suppose that you are writing about the morality of abortion.
You might begin your paper as follows: I shall defend an extreme anti-abortion position by arguing, first, that no satisfactory rationale can be offered for any moderate position on abortion, and secondly, that an extreme pro-abortion position cannot be accepted without also accepting infanticide.
Is my introduction concise?
Does it contain a clear statement of my main thesis? Does it indicate very briefly my main line of argument? Does it explain the overall structure of my essay? The Offering of Reasons for your View After setting out your thesis, and outlining your overall approach in the introductory paragraph, you need to have a section in which you offer reasons for accepting the Mercks case ethical essay that you are advancing.
Each reason should be set out in the form of an explicit, step by step argument, so that the reader can see right off both what your assumptions are, and how they are supposed to support your conclusion. Moreover, if you are offering more than one consideration in support of your thesis, it is important that different considerations not be mixed together in a single paragraph.
Different arguments require at least separate paragraphs - and preferably, separate subsections, each clearly labeled with an appropriate heading.
For the latter will not only help the reader to follow your argument: How many reasons should you offer in support of your thesis?
It is best to confine yourself to either one, or at most two, supporting arguments. If you offer more arguments, there is a serious danger both that you will not set out any of the arguments in a sufficiently detailed way, and that you will not discriminate between interesting arguments in support of your thesis, and arguments that are at best marginal.
In short, choose your best one or two arguments, and develop that argument or arguments in a detailed and circumspect way. Checklist for the Offering of Reasons: Have I set out an argument or at most two arguments to provide reasons for thinking that my thesis is true? Have I made all of my premises clear and explicit?
Have I developed my argument in a full and detailed way, so that all of my reasoning is clear to the reader? Consideration of Objections to your Arguments After offering reasons for accepting your view, you need to consider objections.
The crucial point to note here is that objections come in two forms. First, there are objections that are directed against the reasons that you have offered in support of your thesis, and which claim, therefore, either that some of your assumptions are implausible, or that some of your reasoning is unsatisfactory.
Secondly, there are objections that are directed against your conclusion, and which attempt to provide reasons for thinking that the view which you are advancing is false.
Objections of the first sort are especially crucial, and your main obligation is to address such objections. The reason is that if all that you do is to rebut objections to your thesis, and you fail to consider objections to your argument, then you haven't shown that you have made out a satisfactory positive case in support of your thesis.
How do you arrive at interesting objections to your own arguments? The crucial thing is to look carefully at the assumptions that you have made, and to ask yourself which of those are controversial, in the sense that they might well be questioned by an intelligent, thoughtful, and well-informed person.
Having located a controversial assumption, you need to consider why a thoughtful person might disagree with it, and then try to respond to that objection. Checklist for Objections to your Arguments: Have I carefully set out the most important objection to each of my arguments?
Have I then responded, in a careful way, to that objection or objections? Consideration of Objections to your Thesis After you have carefully considered objections to your argument or argumentsthe next important task is to consider objections which, rather than being directed against the reasons that you have offered in support of your view, are directed instead against your view itself, and which attempt to show that your view is incorrect.
Here you need to set out any such objection or objections in a clear, careful, and dispassionate fashion, and then indicate why you think the objection in question is unsound.
How many objections to your thesis should you attempt to consider? Here, as elsewhere, trying to cover too much ground can result in a weak and superficial discussion. Try to find the strongest objection, and address it in a detailed way.
Checklist for Objections to your Thesis:Essay on Ethical Issues Case - 1) Identification This case presents many ethical issues. I believe that the most important issue of all is the child’s future. Are you looking for help on Case study assignment on Ethical Issues in Asia-Pacific business?
Our professional writers will assist you on this assignment. Open Always. Papers that proved problematic were reviewed within the psychology, sociology, risk management, and . The ethical dilemma in this case is confidentiality and release of information issue.
Ethical problem of information and privacy at work place moral requirement hold prominent position. Truthfulness and accuracy must be to a reasonable degree. Case Study; MERCK, the FDA, and the VIOXX RECALL.
In , the pharmaceutical giant Merck faced major challenges. Vioxx, the company’s once best-selling prescription painkiller, had been pulled off the market in September after Merck realized it increased the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
Ethics Case Studies The SPJ Code of Ethics is voluntarily embraced by thousands of journalists, regardless of place or platform, and is widely used in newsrooms and classrooms as a guide for ethical .
Business Ethics Case Research Papers include a brief explanation on a current business ethics case. Conflict of Interest and Corporate Ethics - Ethics at the corporate level is a topic that has been increasingly prolific in business and MBA course work.